I have been seeing numerous hand wringing over the AI Pictures engines launched not too long ago: https://www.midjourney.com/residence/ and https://openai.com/dall-e-2/ and effectively… there’s in all probability one thing to that tho not the “demise of pictures” degree however extra within the harm by a thousand cuts vein. If you’re within the subject you need to undoubtedly try this Verge article “The scary reality about AI copyright is no person is aware of what is going to occur subsequent”
“The coaching dataset for Secure Diffusion, for instance — one of many largest and most influential text-to-AI programs — comprises billions of photos scraped from a whole lot of domains”
“it’s more likely than not” that coaching programs on copyrighted information can be coated by truthful use. However the identical can not essentially be mentioned for producing content material”
“the present interpretation of truthful use may very well change within the coming months because of a pending Supreme Courtroom case involving Andy Warhol and Prince.”
Here’s a story on the Warhol and Prince case: https://www.npr.org/2022/10/12/1127508725/prince-andy-warhol-supreme-court-copyright
All vital matters to consider. My private opinion is that the pictures generated by the AI engines won’t be copyrightable, giving conventional pictures an edge on the planet of editorial and promoting.
Here’s a deep dive on the subject from a legislation professor at Vanderbilt:
